photo: copyright Jakob Goldstein
The Cuban poet, writer and cultural critic, Carlos A. Aguilera, (b.1970 in Havana) has been living in Frankfurt since August 2007 read Carlo A. Aguilera's biography
by Carlos A. Aguilera
And anyway today he's famous for his shrunken, vertically metaphysical
mind
and not for that lyrikproletarian argument between a yellowbelly
sparrow
that falls and a yellowbelly
sparrow
that flies
or parentheses
between a yellowbelly sparrow that falls and a yellowbelly sparrow
that doesnotfly
as Mao the economist defined smilingly
and as he said: "There, kill them..."
pointing to a light and compact space like that notunique
yellowbelly
sparrow
become now that "disgusting yellowbelly sparrow" or
that "hardly
ecological yellowbelly
sparrow"
radical enemy of / and radical enemy to the point-
of destroying the countryside: "the bureaucratic economy of rice"
and demolishing the countryside: "the bureaucratic economy of ideology"
with its tiny feet one-2-three
(brokebrokebarroke)
of all maointention
as was historically pointed out (or corrected) by komrade Mao
in his nth attempt to make the people think:
"that stupid mass
structured
under the fluffy concept
of The People"
which will never understand the maodemokratik in his movement
against the sparrow
which mutates into
yellowbelly
nor the maodemokratik in his (nearly totalitarian) attempt to
not think about that
yellowbelly
sparrow
which establishes no differences between the surplus value of shaff and
the surplus value of rice
and by that count establishes no difference between a "tradition
of shaff" and a
"tradition of
rice"
just as Mao clarified with a blow to the table and saying:
or what is the same thing: 1000 sparrows dead: 2 hectares
of rice/ 1500 sparrows
dead: 3 hectares of
rice/ 2600 sparrows
dead: 5 hectares of
rice
or I repeat ch'ing ming
where the concept of violence is annuled before the concept of sense
(the time of the chinese
box)
and where the concept of violence should no longer be thought but rather
from the point of what's
"real" in the concept
oneonlysense (as was
clarifed in a very timely
way by president Mao and
as he said in such a timely
way: "if a worker
marches with extensity
eliminate him/ if a
worker marches with
intensity: sweaty
visages with 1 boil
of sense")
highlighting with a metaphor the nonfisure which should exist
between maodemokratik
and sense
and highlighting with the same metaphor the fisure that exists
between tradition
and nonsense: generator
of violence and
aorder/ generator of
nonhistory and "little
literary salons filled with
nonsensical writers"
as was noted by personal scribes of Mao the little father
on large
white sheets
and as the scribe Qi noted later in the final
version of his Life and
Times of President
Mao (3 vol.) where
he explains what Mao
the philosopher called
"the overcoming of
feudohistory and
how/how/how (I insist)
they had gone from a
feudohistory (and a
microhistory) to an
ideohistory and to an
ecohistory and even
from an "unattentive
observation of
history" to a "small
manipulation of history"
(Peking/Peking: you
must return to Peking...)
as the scribe Qi rewrote in that corpus intellectualis
of komrade
Mao
and as the (definitively) civilservant Mao was forced to correct
by taking a knife
putting it on the
little finger of
Qi the scribe and
(in a tone almost
dialektik/military
almost) say to
him "down and to
the bone..."
(crackk...)
